<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The case for expository preaching</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.4-14.org.uk/the-case-for-expository-preaching/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.4-14.org.uk/the-case-for-expository-preaching</link>
	<description>…Then we will no longer be infants, tossed back and forth by the waves…</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 00:44:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rev. David</title>
		<link>http://www.4-14.org.uk/the-case-for-expository-preaching/comment-page-2#comment-25435</link>
		<dc:creator>Rev. David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 05:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.4-14.org.uk/?p=1641#comment-25435</guid>
		<description>I also champion &quot;expository preaching&quot;. Why? It encourages the preacher to preach the whole counsel of God. It teaches your people to read the Bible in context. It forces the preacher to preach the Bible in context and it develops the preachers delivery style.

I have preached through many books of the Bible and it is a challenge and a blessing to present the truth of God&#039;s word in an interesting and vibrant way. 

Of course, expository preaching does involve hard work. After all, it requires study and creativity, especially creativity in sermon outlining. In fact, I am so passionate about creative sermon outlining that I wrote a twelve page article &quot;How To Write Sermons With Ease&quot; to encourage fellow preachers.

Enough of my preaching! I certainly appreciated your article. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also champion &#8220;expository preaching&#8221;. Why? It encourages the preacher to preach the whole counsel of God. It teaches your people to read the Bible in context. It forces the preacher to preach the Bible in context and it develops the preachers delivery style.</p>
<p>I have preached through many books of the Bible and it is a challenge and a blessing to present the truth of God&#8217;s word in an interesting and vibrant way. </p>
<p>Of course, expository preaching does involve hard work. After all, it requires study and creativity, especially creativity in sermon outlining. In fact, I am so passionate about creative sermon outlining that I wrote a twelve page article &#8220;How To Write Sermons With Ease&#8221; to encourage fellow preachers.</p>
<p>Enough of my preaching! I certainly appreciated your article. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Supplee</title>
		<link>http://www.4-14.org.uk/the-case-for-expository-preaching/comment-page-2#comment-24324</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Supplee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 03:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.4-14.org.uk/?p=1641#comment-24324</guid>
		<description>Expository is so badly needed from the pulpit because it allows the preacher to share the message from the heart of God.  The Father&#039;s intention in scripture is to gather the meaning of an extended passage.  That is why he provides us with stories in the gospels and these stories provide powerful material for expository preaching that conveys the essence of God&#039;s heart at length.  So much more rich and compelling than textual sermons that flip about scripture pushing the speakers agenda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Expository is so badly needed from the pulpit because it allows the preacher to share the message from the heart of God.  The Father&#8217;s intention in scripture is to gather the meaning of an extended passage.  That is why he provides us with stories in the gospels and these stories provide powerful material for expository preaching that conveys the essence of God&#8217;s heart at length.  So much more rich and compelling than textual sermons that flip about scripture pushing the speakers agenda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Holloway</title>
		<link>http://www.4-14.org.uk/the-case-for-expository-preaching/comment-page-2#comment-23577</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Holloway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.4-14.org.uk/?p=1641#comment-23577</guid>
		<description>I just wonder if we might be missing the issue a little, that being the preacher is being called to acquiesce to the modern habit of sporadic church attendance. The preacher is truly pressured to choose between what he/she feels is the integrity of the pulpit and the desire to reach the masses. The debate marches on...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wonder if we might be missing the issue a little, that being the preacher is being called to acquiesce to the modern habit of sporadic church attendance. The preacher is truly pressured to choose between what he/she feels is the integrity of the pulpit and the desire to reach the masses. The debate marches on&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.4-14.org.uk/the-case-for-expository-preaching/comment-page-1#comment-23551</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.4-14.org.uk/?p=1641#comment-23551</guid>
		<description>As someone who lectures on preaching styles expository preaching gets my vote every time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone who lectures on preaching styles expository preaching gets my vote every time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.4-14.org.uk/the-case-for-expository-preaching/comment-page-1#comment-23548</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 01:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.4-14.org.uk/?p=1641#comment-23548</guid>
		<description>I enjoyed looking over your blog
God bless you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed looking over your blog<br />
God bless you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Owen Milton</title>
		<link>http://www.4-14.org.uk/the-case-for-expository-preaching/comment-page-1#comment-23537</link>
		<dc:creator>Owen Milton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 17:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.4-14.org.uk/?p=1641#comment-23537</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to make a few comments on the points you raise,Mark.

1)There should be no doubt about the responsibility of the preacher. How that responsibility is discharged is open to question. Why is it necessary to expound extended passages of scripture in order to achieve the end you hold out to us? Paul preached to the Athenians without once quoting the Bible ( not that I commend this method!) He preached &#039;all the counsel of God&#039; to the Ephesians in considerably less than two hundred years. Spurgeon was a &#039;single-text&#039; preacher. It would be a very foolish man who accused him of preaching anything short of or other than the whole counsel of God.

2) Preachers should certainly encourage their congregations to study the Bible, carefully, consistently, painstakingly, &#039;not handling the word of God deceitfully&#039;. Why can this not be done through &#039;single-text&#039; preaching? It is a big step, and scarcely warranted,from saying, &#039;This is how I prepare my sermons&#039;, to &#039;This is how you should read the Bible.&#039; 

3) Using a verse to leap, Lone Ranger-like, into the saddle of my hobby horse must always be discountenanced. To apply the gospel in an invalid way is possible for the &#039;expository&#039; preacher as well as for the &#039;single-text&#039; preacher. If this is more likely to happen with the latter than with the former, then not to apply the gospel at all is more likely with the former than with the latter, as I assume happens in Gospel Standard churches.
I am not sure that we ought to be preoccupied with whether an unbeliever recognizes that our sermons are biblical or no. After all, how many unconverted folk leave our churches saying, &#039;I didn&#039;t think much of that - it was totally unbiblical&#039;? What matters is that the sermon IS biblical. This is a judgment that the non-christian is hardly in a position to make.
And if &#039;expository&#039; sermons are more biblical (which I do not concede) they are usually, in my opinion, more soporific.

4) Your last sentence is applicable (I suspect unintentionally) to both kinds of preachers and, following on from my last sentence, may well be better directed at the &#039;expository&#039; preacher. If we have &#039;bored congregations&#039; it is extremely questionable at the very least whether we should be in a pulpit, a subject you and I have discussed before.
Surely what is important is not the question of a contest between &#039;expository&#039; and &#039;single-text&#039; preachers, but whether we are preachers at all, and that &#039;with the Holy Ghost sent down from heaven&#039;. You hit the nail on the head when you say, &#039;You can be faithful to the Word yet fail to know the Spirit&#039;s power.&#039; 
May I make one final remark. I am a fan of expository preaching. During much of my ministry I used to preach through a book or passage in the morning, then from disparate texts in the evening. When I had finished the series I used to reverse the order. Which was more acceptable or &#039;successful&#039; is not for me to say. I suspect that some people slumbered through both!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to make a few comments on the points you raise,Mark.</p>
<p>1)There should be no doubt about the responsibility of the preacher. How that responsibility is discharged is open to question. Why is it necessary to expound extended passages of scripture in order to achieve the end you hold out to us? Paul preached to the Athenians without once quoting the Bible ( not that I commend this method!) He preached &#8216;all the counsel of God&#8217; to the Ephesians in considerably less than two hundred years. Spurgeon was a &#8216;single-text&#8217; preacher. It would be a very foolish man who accused him of preaching anything short of or other than the whole counsel of God.</p>
<p>2) Preachers should certainly encourage their congregations to study the Bible, carefully, consistently, painstakingly, &#8216;not handling the word of God deceitfully&#8217;. Why can this not be done through &#8216;single-text&#8217; preaching? It is a big step, and scarcely warranted,from saying, &#8216;This is how I prepare my sermons&#8217;, to &#8216;This is how you should read the Bible.&#8217; </p>
<p>3) Using a verse to leap, Lone Ranger-like, into the saddle of my hobby horse must always be discountenanced. To apply the gospel in an invalid way is possible for the &#8216;expository&#8217; preacher as well as for the &#8216;single-text&#8217; preacher. If this is more likely to happen with the latter than with the former, then not to apply the gospel at all is more likely with the former than with the latter, as I assume happens in Gospel Standard churches.<br />
I am not sure that we ought to be preoccupied with whether an unbeliever recognizes that our sermons are biblical or no. After all, how many unconverted folk leave our churches saying, &#8216;I didn&#8217;t think much of that &#8211; it was totally unbiblical&#8217;? What matters is that the sermon IS biblical. This is a judgment that the non-christian is hardly in a position to make.<br />
And if &#8216;expository&#8217; sermons are more biblical (which I do not concede) they are usually, in my opinion, more soporific.</p>
<p>4) Your last sentence is applicable (I suspect unintentionally) to both kinds of preachers and, following on from my last sentence, may well be better directed at the &#8216;expository&#8217; preacher. If we have &#8216;bored congregations&#8217; it is extremely questionable at the very least whether we should be in a pulpit, a subject you and I have discussed before.<br />
Surely what is important is not the question of a contest between &#8216;expository&#8217; and &#8216;single-text&#8217; preachers, but whether we are preachers at all, and that &#8216;with the Holy Ghost sent down from heaven&#8217;. You hit the nail on the head when you say, &#8216;You can be faithful to the Word yet fail to know the Spirit&#8217;s power.&#8217;<br />
May I make one final remark. I am a fan of expository preaching. During much of my ministry I used to preach through a book or passage in the morning, then from disparate texts in the evening. When I had finished the series I used to reverse the order. Which was more acceptable or &#8216;successful&#8217; is not for me to say. I suspect that some people slumbered through both!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Hutton</title>
		<link>http://www.4-14.org.uk/the-case-for-expository-preaching/comment-page-1#comment-23526</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Hutton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.4-14.org.uk/?p=1641#comment-23526</guid>
		<description>Good response Mark.

I do topical sermons all the time, they are expository sermons, but they address relevant topics.

I would argue that for the young minister fresh out of college that expository sermons are the easiest kind.

Without years of battle in the theological trenches (millenialism, predestination, church government, gifts) and years of service in the crush of humanity how do you develop the wisdom (and self confidence) to preach &quot;my ideas&quot; in an edifying way?  It&#039;s a great relief to me to know I only have to help peopel understand what God is saying here.  It&#039;s my job just to apply this living word to this generation.

That I can do.

Bring wisdom into peoples&#039; suffering, pain and wickedness.  Very Hard to do.  Preach God&#039;s word into people&#039;s suffering, pain and wickedness, praise God that&#039;s doable in his grace.

God Bless,
Good to see soem more thought provoking articles arrive on the site - thanks.

Michael hutton,
Australia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good response Mark.</p>
<p>I do topical sermons all the time, they are expository sermons, but they address relevant topics.</p>
<p>I would argue that for the young minister fresh out of college that expository sermons are the easiest kind.</p>
<p>Without years of battle in the theological trenches (millenialism, predestination, church government, gifts) and years of service in the crush of humanity how do you develop the wisdom (and self confidence) to preach &#8220;my ideas&#8221; in an edifying way?  It&#8217;s a great relief to me to know I only have to help peopel understand what God is saying here.  It&#8217;s my job just to apply this living word to this generation.</p>
<p>That I can do.</p>
<p>Bring wisdom into peoples&#8217; suffering, pain and wickedness.  Very Hard to do.  Preach God&#8217;s word into people&#8217;s suffering, pain and wickedness, praise God that&#8217;s doable in his grace.</p>
<p>God Bless,<br />
Good to see soem more thought provoking articles arrive on the site &#8211; thanks.</p>
<p>Michael hutton,<br />
Australia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Thorpe</title>
		<link>http://www.4-14.org.uk/the-case-for-expository-preaching/comment-page-1#comment-23506</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Thorpe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 08:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.4-14.org.uk/?p=1641#comment-23506</guid>
		<description>from r.c. sprouls new puplished  commentary on romans: ref: chapter 8:16 - finally we come to the deepest and highest level of assurance of salvation we can have in this world.THE SPIRIT HIMSELF BEARS WITNESS WITH OUR SPIRIT(V.16)here again we see paul use the word spirit to refer to both the HOLY SPIRIT and our spirit.there is a conversation here,a spiritual communication that come from the HOLY SPIRIT to the human spirit which indicates THAT WE ARE CHILDREN OF GOD (V.16)...in the final analysis our assurance of salvation is not a logical deduction springing from our theology.Our assurance is certinally not based on a careful anylasis of our behaviour.our final assurance comes by the testimony of GOD THE HOLY SPIRIT,who bears witness with and through our spirits that we are children of God.- sprouls commentry is from his expository preaching on romans,I was so blessed may many of his preaching on this I had to share this short statement on romans 8:16 last Sunday evening in Gwersyllt.May it remind us all of the riches of Gods grace ,and also the benifits of expository preaching.in Jesus saving namePaul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>from r.c. sprouls new puplished  commentary on romans: ref: chapter 8:16 &#8211; finally we come to the deepest and highest level of assurance of salvation we can have in this world.THE SPIRIT HIMSELF BEARS WITNESS WITH OUR SPIRIT(V.16)here again we see paul use the word spirit to refer to both the HOLY SPIRIT and our spirit.there is a conversation here,a spiritual communication that come from the HOLY SPIRIT to the human spirit which indicates THAT WE ARE CHILDREN OF GOD (V.16)&#8230;in the final analysis our assurance of salvation is not a logical deduction springing from our theology.Our assurance is certinally not based on a careful anylasis of our behaviour.our final assurance comes by the testimony of GOD THE HOLY SPIRIT,who bears witness with and through our spirits that we are children of God.- sprouls commentry is from his expository preaching on romans,I was so blessed may many of his preaching on this I had to share this short statement on romans 8:16 last Sunday evening in Gwersyllt.May it remind us all of the riches of Gods grace ,and also the benifits of expository preaching.in Jesus saving namePaul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Greco</title>
		<link>http://www.4-14.org.uk/the-case-for-expository-preaching/comment-page-1#comment-23476</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Greco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.4-14.org.uk/?p=1641#comment-23476</guid>
		<description>Mark,

Good letter.  There certainly is a place for the &quot;topical&quot; sermon, but I do believe that by and large we are called to feed our flock from books of the Bible.  As a good friend of mine put it to me: &quot;I don&#039;t care what you think.  I don&#039;t care what I think.  I care what God thinks.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p>
<p>Good letter.  There certainly is a place for the &#8220;topical&#8221; sermon, but I do believe that by and large we are called to feed our flock from books of the Bible.  As a good friend of mine put it to me: &#8220;I don&#8217;t care what you think.  I don&#8217;t care what I think.  I care what God thinks.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Loose</title>
		<link>http://www.4-14.org.uk/the-case-for-expository-preaching/comment-page-1#comment-23477</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Loose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.4-14.org.uk/?p=1641#comment-23477</guid>
		<description>couldn&#039;t agree more Mark - have you seen Christopher Ash&#039;s appendix in his book &#039;the priority of preaching&#039;? It&#039;s entitled &#039;Give God the microphone&#039; and is a defence/commendation of expository preaching.  It&#039;s a great read if you haven&#039;t seen it. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>couldn&#039;t agree more Mark &#8211; have you seen Christopher Ash&#039;s appendix in his book &#039;the priority of preaching&#039;? It&#039;s entitled &#039;Give God the microphone&#039; and is a defence/commendation of expository preaching.  It&#039;s a great read if you haven&#039;t seen it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
